Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
C-
70 / 100

mas.gov.sg

Security report · Scanned February 15, 2026

Checks
8
Passed
4
Warnings
3
Critical
1
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

mas.gov.sg scored 70/100, meeting baseline requirements but with 3 findings that require attention. The vendor can proceed with a remediation timeline agreement.

Critical gaps in: Security Headers. Positive signals: Known Breaches, HSTS Header, CVE Exposure all passed.

4 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How mas.gov.sg compares

Grade distribution across 2520 companies we've scanned. mas.gov.sg scores better than 42% of them.

42th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
79
A+
25
A
184
A-
190
B+
73
B
351
B-
121
C+
113
C
324
C-
117
D+
93
D
237
D-
613
F
mas.gov.sg — Grade C- (70/100) 2520 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of mas.gov.sg's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

Security Headers
Only 0/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
Problem
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
Needs work
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DMARC policy set to reject (strongest); SPF record present with hard-fail (-all). Issues: No DKIM records found for common selectors (may use non-standard selectors).
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 12 nameservers configured (ns9.gdnsec.com., ns12.gdnsdef.com., ns12.gdnsec.com., a20-66.akam.net.); 4 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000 with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: AkamaiNetStorage. (AkamaiNetStorage detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). All detected technologies are upstream CDN/proxy infrastructure. No application-level software versions exposed.
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 158 days remaining; Issued by DigiCert Inc.
Healthy
Recommended actions
4 items

Steps to improve mas.gov.sg's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Strengthen email authentication configuration
Impact: 2–4 Hours
HIGH
Email authentication is partially configured for mas.gov.sg but has gaps. Actions needed: configure DKIM. Until DMARC enforcement is active, spoofed emails may still reach recipients.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
How to fix this
1
Configure DKIM and publish public key in DNS
2
Verify with: nslookup -type=txt _dmarc.mas.gov.sg
2
Add missing security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
Impact: 1–2 Hours
HIGH
5 of 5 recommended security headers are missing on mas.gov.sg: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These headers protect against clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and unauthorized browser feature access. Adding them is a server configuration change with no application code changes required.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Security headers are required application controls
OWASPSecure Headers
Recommended baseline for web applications
How to fix this
1
Add Content-Security-Policy header (start with report-only to avoid breakage)
2
Add: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
3
Add: X-Frame-Options: DENY (or SAMEORIGIN if you use iframes)
4
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
5
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
6
Verify with: curl -sI https://mas.gov.sg | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
3
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for mas.gov.sg can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .sg TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec mas.gov.sg
4
Upgrade to TLS 1.3
Impact: < 1 Hour
LOW
mas.gov.sg negotiated TLSv1.2. TLS 1.2 is still compliant under all major security frameworks and is not a vulnerability. TLS 1.3 offers faster handshakes and removes legacy cipher negotiation. This is a best-practice improvement, not a compliance gap.
How to fix this
1
Update web server config to prefer TLS 1.3 (nginx: ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3)
2
Verify: openssl s_client -connect mas.gov.sg:443 -tls1_3
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.2
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
DMARC Policy
p=reject
Strengths: DMARC policy set to reject (strongest); SPF record present with hard-fail (-all). Issues: No DKIM records found for common selectors (may use non-standard selectors).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 include:support.gov.sg include:amazonses.com -all
Security Headers
0/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000 with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 158 days remaining; Issued by DigiCert Inc.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 12 nameservers configured (ns9.gdnsec.com., ns12.gdnsdef.com., ns12.gdnsec.com., a20-66.akam.net.); 4 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.