Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
B-
80 / 100

bulldozair.com

Security report · Scanned February 18, 2026

Checks
8
Passed
5
Warnings
2
Critical
1
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

bulldozair.com scored 80/100, demonstrating a strong security posture. Minor improvements are noted below.

Critical gaps in: Security Headers. Positive signals: Known Breaches, DNS Configuration, TLS Configuration all passed.

3 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How bulldozair.com compares

Grade distribution across 2378 companies we've scanned. bulldozair.com scores better than 64% of them.

64th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
71
A+
22
A
180
A-
181
B+
69
B
333
B-
111
C+
111
C
295
C-
110
D+
92
D
216
D-
587
F
bulldozair.com — Grade B- (80/100) 2378 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of bulldozair.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

Security Headers
Only 1/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
Problem
HSTS Header
HSTS present but max-age is low (15552000s). Recommended minimum: 15768000 (6 months).
Needs work
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 64 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services. Issues: Wildcard certificate in use — broader attack surface if compromised.
Needs work
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (walt.ns.cloudflare.com., uma.ns.cloudflare.com.); 1 MX records present; DNSSEC enabled; Zone transfers properly restricted.
Healthy
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Healthy
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DMARC policy set to reject (strongest); SPF record present with hard-fail (-all); DKIM configured (selectors: selector1, s1, s2, k1).
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: cloudflare, PHP/7.4.14. (cloudflare detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). No high or critical CVEs found for detected versions.
Healthy
Recommended actions
3 items

Steps to improve bulldozair.com's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Add missing security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
Impact: 1–2 Hours
HIGH
4 of 5 recommended security headers are missing on bulldozair.com: CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These headers protect against clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and unauthorized browser feature access. Adding them is a server configuration change with no application code changes required.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Security headers are required application controls
OWASPSecure Headers
Recommended baseline for web applications
How to fix this
1
Add Content-Security-Policy header (start with report-only to avoid breakage)
2
Add: X-Frame-Options: DENY (or SAMEORIGIN if you use iframes)
3
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
4
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
5
Verify with: curl -sI https://bulldozair.com | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
2
Increase HSTS max-age duration
Impact: < 30 Minutes
MEDIUM
HSTS is enabled but the max-age (0s) is below the recommended minimum of 15768000s (6 months). A short max-age means browsers forget the HTTPS-only policy quickly, reducing protection between visits.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Application security header configuration
How to fix this
1
Update header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
2
Verify: curl -sI https://bulldozair.com | grep -i strict
3
Review certificate configuration
Impact: 1–2 Hours
LOW
Certificate issues found for bulldozair.com: wildcard certificate in use. Wildcard certificates have a broader blast radius if compromised. These are operational hygiene items, not immediate security risks.
How to fix this
1
Consider replacing wildcard cert with individual certs for critical subdomains
2
Consolidate certificate issuance to 1–2 trusted CAs
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
p=reject
Strengths: DMARC policy set to reject (strongest); SPF record present with hard-fail (-all); DKIM configured (selectors: selector1, s1, s2, k1).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:u1198873.wl124.sendgrid.net include:5306774.s
Security Headers
1/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Not enabled
HSTS present but max-age is low (15552000s). Recommended minimum: 15768000 (6 months).
SSL Certificate
Issues
Strengths: Certificate valid, 64 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services. Issues: Wildcard certificate in use — broader attack surface if compromised.
DNSSEC
Enabled
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (walt.ns.cloudflare.com., uma.ns.cloudflare.com.); 1 MX records present; DNSSEC enabled; Zone transfers properly restricted.