Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
B
85 / 100

castle.io

Security report · Scanned February 18, 2026

Checks
8
Passed
5
Warnings
3
Critical
0
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

castle.io scored 85/100, demonstrating a strong security posture. Minor improvements are noted below.

Positive signals: Known Breaches, TLS Configuration, HSTS Header all passed.

3 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How castle.io compares

Grade distribution across 2378 companies we've scanned. castle.io scores better than 78% of them.

78th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
71
A+
22
A
180
A-
181
B+
69
B
333
B-
111
C+
111
C
295
C-
110
D+
92
D
216
D-
587
F
castle.io — Grade B (85/100) 2378 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of castle.io's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: SPF record present with hard-fail (-all); DKIM configured (selectors: google, s1, s2). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement).
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns-712.awsdns-25.net., ns-77.awsdns-09.com., ns-1523.awsdns-62.org., ns-1818.awsdns-35.co.uk.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
Security Headers
3/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP, Permissions-Policy.
Needs work
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Healthy
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000. Missing includeSubDomains. Missing preload directive.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: Netlify, Astro/v5.13.7. (Netlify detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). No high or critical CVEs found for detected versions.
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 65 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt.
Healthy
Recommended actions
3 items

Steps to improve castle.io's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Strengthen email authentication configuration
Impact: 2–4 Hours
HIGH
Email authentication is partially configured for castle.io but has gaps. Actions needed: upgrade DMARC policy from 'none' to 'quarantine' or 'reject'. Until DMARC enforcement is active, spoofed emails may still reach recipients.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
How to fix this
1
Upgrade DMARC policy to p=quarantine (then p=reject after monitoring)
2
Verify with: nslookup -type=txt _dmarc.castle.io
2
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for castle.io can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .io TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec castle.io
3
Add optional security headers (CSP, Permissions-Policy)
Impact: < 1 Hour
LOW
castle.io has most security headers configured. Missing: CSP, Permissions-Policy. These are best-practice additions that reduce the attack surface for client-side vulnerabilities.
How to fix this
1
Add Content-Security-Policy header (start with report-only to avoid breakage)
2
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
3
Verify with: curl -sI https://castle.io | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
p=none
Strengths: SPF record present with hard-fail (-all); DKIM configured (selectors: google, s1, s2). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:aspmx.pardo
Security Headers
3/5 present
Missing: CSP, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000. Missing includeSubDomains. Missing preload directive.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 65 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns-712.awsdns-25.net., ns-77.awsdns-09.com., ns-1523.awsdns-62.org., ns-1818.awsdns-35.co.uk.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.