Security checks — sorted by severity
Security Headers
None of the 5 recommended security headers are present (missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy). This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
None of the 5 recommended security headers are present (missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy). This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: SPF record present with soft-fail (~all). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement); DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua); No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
Strengths: SPF record present with soft-fail (~all). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement); DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua); No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
MX Records & Mail Provider
Strengths: Mail handled by Microsoft 365; 1 MX record(s) configured. Issues: Only 1 MX record — no failover if primary mail server is unavailable.
Strengths: Mail handled by Microsoft 365; 1 MX record(s) configured. Issues: Only 1 MX record — no failover if primary mail server is unavailable.
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
DNS CAA Records
No CAA records found. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorized CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.
No CAA records found. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorized CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 3 nameservers configured (ns1.wordpress.com., ns3.wordpress.com., ns2.wordpress.com.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Strengths: 3 nameservers configured (ns1.wordpress.com., ns3.wordpress.com., ns2.wordpress.com.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
security.txt (RFC 9116)
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days). Missing includeSubDomains — subdomains not covered. Missing preload directive.
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days). Missing includeSubDomains — subdomains not covered. Missing preload directive.
Cookie Security
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: nginx. No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Detected technologies: nginx. No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 78 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services.
Strengths: Certificate valid, 78 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services.
Recommended actions
1+ items
Steps to improve chailabs.ai's security grade, ranked by impact.
1
Set up email authentication (DKIM)
Without email authentication, anyone can send emails that appear to come from chailabs.ai. This is the most common vector for phishing attacks targeting employees and customers. DKIM is not configured.
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
ISO 27001A.13.2.1
Information transfer policies require email security controls
HIPAA§164.312(e)
Transmission security for electronic PHI
How to fix this
1
Add SPF record to DNS: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all (adjust for your email provider)
2
Configure DKIM signing with your email provider and publish the public key in DNS
3
Add DMARC record: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:[email protected]
4
Monitor DMARC reports for 2–4 weeks, then upgrade policy to p=reject
See all 2 remaining recommendations
Enter your work email to unlock the full action plan.
No spam. We only send security-related updates.
Report unlocked.
AI Summary
What this means
chailabs.ai scored 72/100, meeting baseline requirements but with 5 findings that require attention. The vendor can proceed with a remediation timeline agreement.
Critical gaps in: Security Headers, DMARC / Email Security. Positive signals: TLS Protocol Support, TLS Configuration, HSTS Header all passed.
3 action items identified, including 1 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.
How chailabs.ai compares
Grade distribution across 2678 companies we've scanned. chailabs.ai scores better than 46% of them.
88
A+
28
A
194
A-
200
B+
75
B
376
B-
137
C+
117
C
347
C-
123
D+
96
D
265
D-
632
F
chailabs.ai — Grade C- (72/100)
2678 companies scanned
At a glance
Key data points from the scan.
TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
p=none
Strengths: SPF record present with soft-fail (~all). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement); DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua); No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 include:_spf.wpcloud.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
Security Headers
0/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days). Missing includeSubDomains — subdomains not covered. Missing preload directive.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 78 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 3 nameservers configured (ns1.wordpress.com., ns3.wordpress.com., ns2.wordpress.com.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Similar companies
Other domains with comparable security profiles.
