Is convertico.com safe to use as a vendor?

convertico.com scored 70/100 on LynxRadar's security posture assessment. The domain partially meets security requirements with some gaps to address. 8 checks passed, 5 warnings, 2 critical issues across 16 passive checks including TLS, DMARC, security headers, breaches, and CVEs.

What TLS version does convertico.com use?

convertico.com uses TLSv1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384. TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.

Does convertico.com have SPF configured?

Yes. SPF record: v=spf1 a: ip4:85.17.4.234 ~all

Does convertico.com have security headers configured?

convertico.com has 0 of 5 recommended security headers. Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy.

Has convertico.com been involved in a data breach?

No known breaches found. No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.

Does convertico.com have known CVE vulnerabilities?

Detected technologies: Apache. No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).

Is convertico.com's SSL certificate valid?

Yes. Strengths: Certificate valid, 74 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt; 204 certificates logged in CT; Certificates from 2 CAs: "cPanel, Let's Encrypt.

convertico.com Security Report — Grade C- (70/100)

Q: Does convertico.com have DMARC configured?

Yes. convertico.com's DMARC policy is set to 'quarantine'. SPF record: yes. Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; Forensic reports (ruf) configured; SPF soft-fail (~all) configured; SPF DNS lookup count: 1/10 (within limit). Issues: DMARC policy is 'quarantine', not 'reject' — spoofed mail is moved to spam rather than blocked outright; DMARC pct=10 — policy only applies to 10% of mail; 90% of spoofed messages bypass enforcement; DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua) — policy violations won't be reported. Note: DKIM couldn't be confirmed from outside (custom selector names can't be looked up, and some DNS hosts don't expose them), so it isn't counted against the score.

Q: Does convertico.com use HSTS?

No. Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks. If this domain is in the browser HSTS preload list, browsers may still enforce HTTPS — but the header should be present for full coverage.

Q: Does convertico.com have DNSSEC enabled?

No. Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (pns33.cloudns.net, pns34.cloudns.net, pns31.cloudns.net, pns32.cloudns.net); Zone transfers properly restricted on all nameservers; Address records present: 1 A record(s). Issues: All nameservers are from a single provider (cloudns.net) — a provider outage takes down the domain; SOA MNAME 'ns31.cloudns.net' not listed in NS records — possible lame delegation or stale primary nameserver reference; DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed or tampered with in transit (DNS cache poisoning).

C-

Trust rating

Fair · 70/100

Procurement snapshot

0 critical findings identified — these point to architectural gaps, not just configuration tweaks.

Strengths

MX Records & Mail Provider

TLS Configuration

Known Breaches

TLS Protocol Support

Questions to ask

Confirm MTA-STS rollout plans for inbound email

Estimated remediation effort: 2–4 days

Based on a passive external scan — supplement with vendor-provided attestations, not a replacement.

Trust Score Trend

→ No change 1 scan · Last scanned October 15, 2026

Score

100 75 50 25 0

C-

convertico.com

70/100

Compliance & Certifications

Not yet verified

SOC 2 Type II

Audit report not on file

3rd party · AICPA

ISO 27001

Certificate not on file

3rd party · accredited body

GDPR

DPA not on file

Self-reported

CCPA

Self-reported

Incident History

No public breaches on record

Security Posture

7 items need attention

8 passed

Finish setting up email authentication

DMARC / Email Security

2–4 hours High

Spoofed emails can still reach your customers and partners until this is fully enforced. Email authentication for convertico.com is partly set up, but there are gaps: your DMARC policy only applies to 10% of mail. Until it's fully in place, someone could still send a convincing fake email pretending to be you.

NIST SP 800-177r1§4

Trustworthy Email recommends SPF, DKIM and DMARC for every email domain

How to fix this

1Remove "pct=10" from your DMARC record in your domain's DNS settings (check with whoever manages your website or domain registration) so the policy covers all mail. Your current record with just that change:

v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; adkim=r; aspf=r; fo=1; ri=86400; rf=afrf

2If DKIM signing isn't on yet (we can't confirm it from outside): Turn on DKIM signing — look for "DKIM" under your email provider's admin/security settings. It gives you a record to add in your domain's DNS settings (check with whoever manages your website or domain registration).

3Double-check it's live: search "dmarc record checker" and enter convertico.com.

Email authentication guide

Report unlocked.

View all 8 passed checks

MX Records & Mail Provider

TLS Configuration

Known Breaches

TLS Protocol Support

Certificate Hygiene

Cookie Security

CVE Exposure

Subprocessors & Tech Stack

Couldn't check: Malware / Phishing Blocklist — the check didn't complete (the site blocked or timed out our scanner, or a data source was unavailable), so this isn't counted in the score.

Company Signals

Operational risk

Last funding

Employees

Trust Resources

Claim profile →

Trust Center

Not detected

DPA (Data Processing Agreement)

Subprocessors List

Similar companies

Appears in

Vendors graded C

714 companies · LynxRadar ranking

Blocking Issues

Not enabled

Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks. If this domain is in the browser HSTS preload list, browsers may still enforce HTTPS — but the header should be present for full coverage.

Likelihood: ★★★☆☆

Impact: ★★★★☆

0/5 present

Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy

Likelihood: ★★★☆☆

Impact: ★★★☆☆

High Priority

p=quarantine

Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; Forensic reports (ruf) configured; SPF soft-fail (~all) configured; SPF DNS lookup count: 1/10 (within limit). Issues: DMARC policy is 'quarantine', not 'reject' — spoofed mail is moved to spam rather than blocked outright; DMARC pct=10 — policy only applies to 10% of mail; 90% of spoofed messages bypass enforcement; DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua) — policy violations won't be reported. Note: DKIM couldn't be confirmed from outside (custom selector names can't be looked up, and some DNS hosts don't expose them), so it isn't counted against the score.

Likelihood: ★★★☆☆

Impact: ★★★☆☆

Medium Priority

Warn

Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks; sending servers cannot verify your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record (_smtp._tls) — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to the domain owner.

Likelihood: ★★☆☆☆

Impact: ★★★☆☆

Not enabled

Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (pns33.cloudns.net, pns34.cloudns.net, pns31.cloudns.net, pns32.cloudns.net); Zone transfers properly restricted on all nameservers; Address records present: 1 A record(s). Issues: All nameservers are from a single provider (cloudns.net) — a provider outage takes down the domain; SOA MNAME 'ns31.cloudns.net' not listed in NS records — possible lame delegation or stale primary nameserver reference; DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed or tampered with in transit (DNS cache poisoning).

Likelihood: ★★☆☆☆

Impact: ★★★☆☆

Best Practice

Warn

No CAA records found in the DNS tree for this domain. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorised CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.

Likelihood: ★☆☆☆☆

Impact: ★☆☆☆☆

Warn

No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.

Likelihood: ★☆☆☆☆

Impact: ★☆☆☆☆