Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
B-
82 / 100

data.melbourne.vic.gov.au

Security report · Scanned April 18, 2026

Checks
14
Passed
10
Warnings
3
Critical
1
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

data.melbourne.vic.gov.au scored 82/100, demonstrating a strong security posture. Minor improvements are noted below.

Critical gaps in: DMARC / Email Security. Positive signals: MX Records & Mail Provider, TLS Configuration, Known Breaches all passed.

2 action items identified, including 1 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How data.melbourne.vic.gov.au compares

Grade distribution across 2565 companies we've scanned. data.melbourne.vic.gov.au scores better than 72% of them.

72th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
81
A+
25
A
186
A-
194
B+
73
B
357
B-
122
C+
114
C
328
C-
119
D+
95
D
247
D-
624
F
data.melbourne.vic.gov.au — Grade B- (82/100) 2565 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of data.melbourne.vic.gov.au's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DKIM configured (selectors: s1, s2). Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found.
Problem
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Needs work
DNS CAA Records
Strengths: CAA records configured (11 record(s)); Authorized CAs: certigna.fr, d-trust.net, digicert.com, globalsign.com, kpn.com, letsencrypt.org, quovadisglobal.com, sectigo.com, swisssign.com, telesec.de, amazonaws.com. Issues: No iodef record — CA violations won't be reported to the domain owner.
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Issues: No NS records found (unusual); DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
MX Records & Mail Provider
No MX records found. This domain does not receive email directly — this is intentional for many domains and carries no security risk. If email is expected, verify mail routing via A/AAAA fallback or a mail provider.
Healthy
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Healthy
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
security.txt (RFC 9116)
Strengths: security.txt found with 3 field(s); Contact: mailto:[email protected]; Expires in 8659 days (2050-01-01T11:00:00.000Z); Preferred languages: en,fr. Issues: Not PGP signed (recommended for authenticity).
Healthy
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days). includeSubDomains present. Missing preload directive.
Healthy
Security Headers
4/5 security headers present. Missing: X-Frame-Options.
Healthy
Cookie Security
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
Healthy
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: openresty. No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 74 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt; 55 certificates logged in CT; Certificates from 2 CAs: GlobalSign nv-sa, Let's Encrypt.
Healthy
Recommended actions
2 items

Steps to improve data.melbourne.vic.gov.au's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Set up email authentication (DMARC, SPF)
Impact: 1–2 Days
CRITICAL
Without email authentication, anyone can send emails that appear to come from data.melbourne.vic.gov.au. This is the most common vector for phishing attacks targeting employees and customers. DMARC, SPF are not configured.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
ISO 27001A.13.2.1
Information transfer policies require email security controls
HIPAA§164.312(e)
Transmission security for electronic PHI
How to fix this
1
Add SPF record to DNS: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all (adjust for your email provider)
2
Configure DKIM signing with your email provider and publish the public key in DNS
3
Add DMARC record: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:[email protected]
4
Monitor DMARC reports for 2–4 weeks, then upgrade policy to p=reject
2
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for data.melbourne.vic.gov.au can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .au TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec data.melbourne.vic.gov.au
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
Not configured
Strengths: DKIM configured (selectors: s1, s2). Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found.
SPF Record
Missing
No SPF record found.
Security Headers
4/5 present
Missing: X-Frame-Options
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days). includeSubDomains present. Missing preload directive.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 74 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt; 55 certificates logged in CT; Certificates from 2 CAs: GlobalSign nv-sa, Let's Encrypt.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Issues: No NS records found (unusual); DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.