Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
B+
88 / 100

enmax.com

Security report · Scanned April 29, 2026

Checks
14
Passed
9
Warnings
4
Critical
1
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

enmax.com scored 88/100, demonstrating a strong security posture. Minor improvements are noted below.

Critical gaps in: Security Headers. Positive signals: TLS Protocol Support, TLS Configuration, DNS CAA Records all passed.

2 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How enmax.com compares

Grade distribution across 2612 companies we've scanned. enmax.com scores better than 81% of them.

81th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
85
A+
25
A
189
A-
197
B+
75
B
362
B-
132
C+
114
C
333
C-
121
D+
95
D
256
D-
628
F
enmax.com — Grade B+ (88/100) 2612 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of enmax.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

Security Headers
2/5 security headers present. Missing: X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
Problem
MX Records & Mail Provider
Strengths: Mail handled by Microsoft 365; 1 MX record(s) configured. Issues: Only 1 MX record — no failover if primary mail server is unavailable.
Needs work
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (clay.ns.cloudflare.com., sofia.ns.cloudflare.com.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
security.txt (RFC 9116)
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
Needs work
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Healthy
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Healthy
DNS CAA Records
Strengths: CAA records configured (13 record(s)); Authorized CAs: comodoca.com, digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes, entrust.net, letsencrypt.org, pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes, ssl.com; Violation reporting (iodef) configured.
Healthy
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=15552000s (180 days). includeSubDomains present. preload present.
Healthy
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: selector1, s1, s2).
Healthy
Cookie Security
Strengths: 2 cookie(s) analyzed; All cookies have Secure flag; All cookies have HttpOnly flag; All cookies have SameSite attribute.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: cloudflare, Next.js. (cloudflare detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 47 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services. Note: Wildcard certificate in use (*.domain) — covers all subdomains. Common practice; worth noting that compromise would affect all subdomains.
Healthy
Recommended actions
2 items

Steps to improve enmax.com's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Add missing security headers (X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
Impact: 1–2 Hours
HIGH
3 of 5 recommended security headers are missing on enmax.com: X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These headers protect against clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and unauthorized browser feature access. Adding them is a server configuration change with no application code changes required.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Security headers are required application controls
OWASPSecure Headers
Recommended baseline for web applications
How to fix this
1
Add: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN (use DENY only if you never embed your pages in iframes)
2
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
3
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
4
Verify with: curl -sI https://enmax.com | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
2
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for enmax.com can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .com TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec enmax.com
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
p=quarantine
Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: selector1, s1, s2).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 include:enmax.com._nspf.vali.email include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email ~all
Security Headers
2/5 present
Missing: X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=15552000s (180 days). includeSubDomains present. preload present.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 47 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services. Note: Wildcard certificate in use (*.domain) — covers all subdomains. Common practice; worth noting that compromise would affect all subdomains.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (clay.ns.cloudflare.com., sofia.ns.cloudflare.com.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.