A+
98/100

ethcasino.io

April 09, 2026 ·
4 Warnings 10 Passed 14 checks
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Needs work
DNS CAA Records
Strengths: CAA records configured (10 record(s)); Authorized CAs: comodoca.com, digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes, letsencrypt.org, pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes, ssl.com. Issues: No iodef record — CA violations won't be reported to the domain owner.
Strengths: CAA records configured (10 record(s)); Authorized CAs: comodoca.com, digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes, letsencrypt.org, pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes, ssl.com. Issues: No iodef record — CA violations won't be reported to the domain owner.
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (melany.ns.cloudflare.com., marvin.ns.cloudflare.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (melany.ns.cloudflare.com., marvin.ns.cloudflare.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
security.txt (RFC 9116)
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
Needs work
MX Records & Mail Provider
Strengths: Mail handled by Google Workspace; 5 MX record(s) configured; Multiple MX records provide redundancy.
Strengths: Mail handled by Google Workspace; 5 MX record(s) configured; Multiple MX records provide redundancy.
Passed
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Passed
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Passed
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
Passed
Security Headers
4/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP.
4/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP.
Passed
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: google).
Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: google).
Passed
Cookie Security
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
Passed
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Passed
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: cloudflare. (cloudflare detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). All detected technologies are upstream CDN/proxy infrastructure. No application-level software versions exposed.
Detected technologies: cloudflare. (cloudflare detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). All detected technologies are upstream CDN/proxy infrastructure. No application-level software versions exposed.
Passed
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 54 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services; 196 certificates logged in CT; Certificates from 4 CAs: Google Trust Services, Google Trust Services LLC, Let's Encrypt.
Strengths: Certificate valid, 54 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services; 196 certificates logged in CT; Certificates from 4 CAs: Google Trust Services, Google Trust Services LLC, Let's Encrypt.
Passed
Recommended actions 1 items

Steps to improve ethcasino.io's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
1–3 days (depends on registrar) High

Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for ethcasino.io can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.

NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1 Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2 Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3 Add the DS record to your registrar for .io TLD
4 Verify: dig +dnssec ethcasino.io
AI Summary
What this means

ethcasino.io scored 98/100, demonstrating a strong security posture. Minor improvements are noted below.

Positive signals: MX Records & Mail Provider, TLS Configuration, TLS Protocol Support all passed.

1 action item identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How ethcasino.io compares

Grade distribution across 2678 companies we've scanned. ethcasino.io scores better than 97% of them.

97th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
88
A+
28
A
194
A-
200
B+
75
B
376
B-
137
C+
117
C
347
C-
123
D+
96
D
265
D-
632
F
ethcasino.io — Grade A+ (98/100) 2678 companies scanned
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
p=quarantine
Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: google).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 include:customeriomail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
Security Headers
4/5 present
Missing: CSP
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 54 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services; 196 certificates logged in CT; Certificates from 4 CAs: Google Trust Services, Google Trust Services LLC, Let's Encrypt.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (melany.ns.cloudflare.com., marvin.ns.cloudflare.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.