Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
F
52 / 100

filthyhero.com

Security report · Scanned April 14, 2026

Checks
14
Passed
3
Warnings
7
Critical
4
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

filthyhero.com scored 52/100 and does not meet the minimum security posture threshold. The most critical issue is: Set up email authentication (DKIM). This must be addressed before the vendor can be approved for procurement or data processing activities.

Critical gaps in: HSTS Header, Security Headers, Cookie Security, DMARC / Email Security. Positive signals: Known Breaches, CVE Exposure, Certificate Hygiene all passed.

5 action items identified, including 1 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How filthyhero.com compares

Grade distribution across 2552 companies we've scanned. filthyhero.com scores better than 15% of them.

15th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
81
A+
25
A
184
A-
192
B+
73
B
353
B-
122
C+
113
C
327
C-
119
D+
95
D
244
D-
624
F
filthyhero.com — Grade F (52/100) 2552 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of filthyhero.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

HSTS Header
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
Problem
Security Headers
None of the 5 recommended security headers are present (missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy). This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
Problem
Cookie Security
Strengths: 1 cookie(s) analyzed. Issues: 1/1 cookie(s) missing Secure flag (vn); 1/1 cookie(s) missing HttpOnly flag (vn); 1/1 cookie(s) missing SameSite attribute (vn).
Problem
DMARC / Email Security
Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement); DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua); SPF record uses neutral (?all) — no real enforcement; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
Problem
MX Records & Mail Provider
Strengths: Mail handled by mail.filthyhero.com; 1 MX record(s) configured. Issues: Only 1 MX record — no failover if primary mail server is unavailable.
Needs work
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Needs work
DNS CAA Records
No CAA records found. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorized CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.
Needs work
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
Needs work
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.2 supported (consider enabling TLS 1.3). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: No, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Needs work
security.txt (RFC 9116)
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (dnsc.mojohost.com., dnsb.mojohost.com., dnsa.mojohost.com., dnsd.mojohost.com.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: Apache. No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 63 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt.
Healthy
Recommended actions
5 items

Steps to improve filthyhero.com's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Set up email authentication (DKIM)
Impact: 1–2 Days
CRITICAL
Without email authentication, anyone can send emails that appear to come from filthyhero.com. This is the most common vector for phishing attacks targeting employees and customers. DKIM is not configured.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
ISO 27001A.13.2.1
Information transfer policies require email security controls
HIPAA§164.312(e)
Transmission security for electronic PHI
How to fix this
1
Add SPF record to DNS: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all (adjust for your email provider)
2
Configure DKIM signing with your email provider and publish the public key in DNS
3
Add DMARC record: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:[email protected]
4
Monitor DMARC reports for 2–4 weeks, then upgrade policy to p=reject
2
Enable HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security)
Impact: < 1 Hour
HIGH
The HSTS header is missing on filthyhero.com. Without it, connections can be downgraded from HTTPS to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks. This is a straightforward server configuration change.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Required application security controls
NIST 800-53SC-8
Transmission confidentiality and integrity
How to fix this
1
Add header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
2
Verify all subdomains support HTTPS before adding includeSubDomains
3
Test with: curl -sI https://filthyhero.com | grep -i strict
4
Submit to hstspreload.org after confirming the header is correct
3
Add missing security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
Impact: 1–2 Hours
HIGH
5 of 5 recommended security headers are missing on filthyhero.com: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These headers protect against clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and unauthorized browser feature access. Adding them is a server configuration change with no application code changes required.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Security headers are required application controls
OWASPSecure Headers
Recommended baseline for web applications
How to fix this
1
Add a Content-Security-Policy header. Safe starting value (works with Google Fonts and inline styles/scripts): default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; upgrade-insecure-requests. Test your site after adding it, then tighten over time by removing 'unsafe-inline'.
2
Add: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
3
Add: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN (use DENY only if you never embed your pages in iframes)
4
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
5
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
6
Verify with: curl -sI https://filthyhero.com | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
4
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for filthyhero.com can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .com TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec filthyhero.com
5
Upgrade to TLS 1.3
Impact: < 1 Hour
LOW
filthyhero.com negotiated TLSv1.2. TLS 1.2 is still compliant under all major security frameworks and is not a vulnerability. TLS 1.3 offers faster handshakes and removes legacy cipher negotiation. This is a best-practice improvement, not a compliance gap.
How to fix this
1
Update web server config to prefer TLS 1.3 (nginx: ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3)
2
Verify: openssl s_client -connect filthyhero.com:443 -tls1_3
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.2
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
DMARC Policy
p=none
Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement); DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua); SPF record uses neutral (?all) — no real enforcement; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 a mx ?all
Security Headers
0/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Not enabled
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 63 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (dnsc.mojohost.com., dnsb.mojohost.com., dnsa.mojohost.com., dnsd.mojohost.com.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.