Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
AI-Generated Summary
What this means
goubiq.com scored 45/100 and does not currently meet the minimum security posture threshold. Multiple configuration gaps were identified that require attention before approval.
Critical gaps in: HSTS Header, Security Headers, CVE Exposure. Positive signals: Known Breaches, Certificate Hygiene all passed.
6 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.
How goubiq.com compares
Grade distribution across 2378 companies we've scanned. goubiq.com scores better than 12% of them.
71
A+
22
A
180
A-
181
B+
69
B
333
B-
111
C+
111
C
295
C-
110
D+
92
D
216
D-
587
F
goubiq.com — Grade F (45/100)
2378 companies scanned
Security checks
Each check inspects a different part of goubiq.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.
HSTS Header
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
Security Headers
Only 0/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: nginx/1.10.3, WordPress/4.9.5. 1 critical-severity CVE(s) found (CVSS >= 9.0): CVE-2025-10412. Immediate patching recommended.
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns3dty.name.com., ns4blx.name.com., ns1cmt.name.com., ns2glx.name.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: google, s1, s2, mandrill). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement); DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua).
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 164 days remaining; Issued by Amazon.
Recommended actions
6 items
Steps to improve goubiq.com's security grade, ranked by impact.
1
Strengthen email authentication configuration
Email authentication is partially configured for goubiq.com but has gaps. Actions needed: upgrade DMARC policy from 'none' to 'quarantine' or 'reject'. Until DMARC enforcement is active, spoofed emails may still reach recipients.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
How to fix this
1
Upgrade DMARC policy to p=quarantine (then p=reject after monitoring)
2
Verify with: nslookup -type=txt _dmarc.goubiq.com
See all recommendations
Enter your work email to unlock the full action plan.
No spam. We only send security-related updates.
Report unlocked.
2
Enable HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security)
The HSTS header is missing on goubiq.com. Without it, connections can be downgraded from HTTPS to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks. This is a straightforward server configuration change.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Required application security controls
NIST 800-53SC-8
Transmission confidentiality and integrity
How to fix this
1
Add header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
2
Verify all subdomains support HTTPS before adding includeSubDomains
3
Test with: curl -sI https://goubiq.com | grep -i strict
4
Submit to hstspreload.org after confirming the header is correct
3
Add missing security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
5 of 5 recommended security headers are missing on goubiq.com: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These headers protect against clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and unauthorized browser feature access. Adding them is a server configuration change with no application code changes required.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Security headers are required application controls
OWASPSecure Headers
Recommended baseline for web applications
How to fix this
1
Add Content-Security-Policy header (start with report-only to avoid breakage)
2
Add: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
3
Add: X-Frame-Options: DENY (or SAMEORIGIN if you use iframes)
4
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
5
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
6
Verify with: curl -sI https://goubiq.com | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
4
Patch 1 critical CVE
Externally visible software on goubiq.com has 1 critical CVE (CVSS >= 9.0). Update the affected software to the latest patched version.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SI-2
Flaw remediation
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.3.3
Critical patches within 1 month
How to fix this
1
Review CVEs: CVE-2025-10412
2
Update affected software to latest patched versions
3
Verify patches applied: re-scan after update
4
Consider hiding server version headers to reduce future exposure
5
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for goubiq.com can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .com TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec goubiq.com
6
Upgrade to TLS 1.3
goubiq.com negotiated TLSv1.2. TLS 1.2 is still compliant under all major security frameworks and is not a vulnerability. TLS 1.3 offers faster handshakes and removes legacy cipher negotiation. This is a best-practice improvement, not a compliance gap.
How to fix this
1
Update web server config to prefer TLS 1.3 (nginx: ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3)
2
Verify: openssl s_client -connect goubiq.com:443 -tls1_3
At a glance
Key data points from the scan.
TLS Version
TLSv1.2
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
DMARC Policy
p=none
Strengths: SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: google, s1, s2, mandrill). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement); DMARC has no aggregate report URI (rua).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all
Security Headers
0/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Not enabled
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 164 days remaining; Issued by Amazon.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns3dty.name.com., ns4blx.name.com., ns1cmt.name.com., ns2glx.name.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.