B-
82/100

members.leakradar.io

April 18, 2026 ·
2 Critical 3 Warnings 9 Passed 14 checks
DMARC / Email Security
Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
Critical
Cookie Security
Strengths: 1 cookie(s) analyzed; All cookies have SameSite attribute. Issues: 1/1 cookie(s) missing Secure flag (NEXT_LOCALE); 1/1 cookie(s) missing HttpOnly flag (NEXT_LOCALE).
Strengths: 1 cookie(s) analyzed; All cookies have SameSite attribute. Issues: 1/1 cookie(s) missing Secure flag (NEXT_LOCALE); 1/1 cookie(s) missing HttpOnly flag (NEXT_LOCALE).
Critical
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Needs work
DNS CAA Records
No CAA records found. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorized CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.
No CAA records found. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorized CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Issues: No NS records found (unusual); DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Issues: No NS records found (unusual); DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
MX Records & Mail Provider
No MX records found. This domain does not receive email directly — this is intentional for many domains and carries no security risk. If email is expected, verify mail routing via A/AAAA fallback or a mail provider.
No MX records found. This domain does not receive email directly — this is intentional for many domains and carries no security risk. If email is expected, verify mail routing via A/AAAA fallback or a mail provider.
Passed
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Passed
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Passed
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Passed
security.txt (RFC 9116)
Strengths: security.txt found with 3 field(s); Contact: mailto:[email protected] - Don't report low or info; Expires in 1353 days (2030-01-01T00:01:00.000Z); Preferred languages: fr, en. Issues: Not PGP signed (recommended for authenticity).
Strengths: security.txt found with 3 field(s); Contact: mailto:[email protected] - Don't report low or info; Expires in 1353 days (2030-01-01T00:01:00.000Z); Preferred languages: fr, en. Issues: Not PGP signed (recommended for authenticity).
Passed
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
Passed
Security Headers
All 5 recommended security headers present: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy.
All 5 recommended security headers present: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy.
Passed
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: cloudflare, Next.js. (cloudflare detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Detected technologies: cloudflare, Next.js. (cloudflare detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Passed
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 54 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services; 18 certificates logged in CT.
Strengths: Certificate valid, 54 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services; 18 certificates logged in CT.
Passed
Recommended actions 1+ items

Steps to improve members.leakradar.io's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Set up email authentication (DMARC, SPF, DKIM)
1–2 days Critical

Without email authentication, anyone can send emails that appear to come from members.leakradar.io. This is the most common vector for phishing attacks targeting employees and customers. DMARC, SPF, DKIM are not configured.

NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
ISO 27001A.13.2.1
Information transfer policies require email security controls
HIPAA§164.312(e)
Transmission security for electronic PHI
How to fix this
1 Add SPF record to DNS: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all (adjust for your email provider)
2 Configure DKIM signing with your email provider and publish the public key in DNS
3 Add DMARC record: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:[email protected]
4 Monitor DMARC reports for 2–4 weeks, then upgrade policy to p=reject
AI Summary
What this means

members.leakradar.io scored 82/100, demonstrating a strong security posture. Minor improvements are noted below.

Critical gaps in: DMARC / Email Security, Cookie Security. Positive signals: MX Records & Mail Provider, TLS Protocol Support, TLS Configuration all passed.

2 action items identified, including 1 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How members.leakradar.io compares

Grade distribution across 2678 companies we've scanned. members.leakradar.io scores better than 72% of them.

72th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
88
A+
28
A
194
A-
200
B+
75
B
376
B-
137
C+
117
C
347
C-
123
D+
96
D
265
D-
632
F
members.leakradar.io — Grade B- (82/100) 2678 companies scanned
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
Not configured
Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
SPF Record
Missing
No SPF record found.
Security Headers
5/5 present
All headers configured.
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 54 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services; 18 certificates logged in CT.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Issues: No NS records found (unusual); DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.