Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
D-
62 / 100

mojo-app.com

Security report · Scanned February 18, 2026

Checks
8
Passed
4
Warnings
1
Critical
3
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

mojo-app.com scored 62/100, meeting baseline requirements but with 1 finding that require attention. The vendor can proceed with a remediation timeline agreement.

Critical gaps in: HSTS Header, Security Headers, DMARC / Email Security. Positive signals: TLS Configuration, CVE Exposure, Known Breaches all passed.

4 action items identified, including 1 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How mojo-app.com compares

Grade distribution across 2378 companies we've scanned. mojo-app.com scores better than 26% of them.

26th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
71
A+
22
A
180
A-
181
B+
69
B
333
B-
111
C+
111
C
295
C-
110
D+
92
D
216
D-
587
F
mojo-app.com — Grade D- (62/100) 2378 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of mojo-app.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

HSTS Header
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
Problem
Security Headers
Only 0/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
Problem
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: SPF record present with soft-fail (~all). Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
Problem
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns4.dnsimple-edge.org., ns1.dnsimple.com., ns2.dnsimple-edge.net., ns3.dnsimple.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: Google, Proxy/CDN. (Proxy/CDN detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 39 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services.
Healthy
Recommended actions
4 items

Steps to improve mojo-app.com's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Set up email authentication (DMARC, DKIM)
Impact: 1–2 Days
CRITICAL
Without email authentication, anyone can send emails that appear to come from mojo-app.com. This is the most common vector for phishing attacks targeting employees and customers. DMARC, DKIM are not configured.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
ISO 27001A.13.2.1
Information transfer policies require email security controls
HIPAA§164.312(e)
Transmission security for electronic PHI
How to fix this
1
Add SPF record to DNS: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all (adjust for your email provider)
2
Configure DKIM signing with your email provider and publish the public key in DNS
3
Add DMARC record: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:[email protected]
4
Monitor DMARC reports for 2–4 weeks, then upgrade policy to p=reject
2
Enable HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security)
Impact: < 1 Hour
HIGH
The HSTS header is missing on mojo-app.com. Without it, connections can be downgraded from HTTPS to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks. This is a straightforward server configuration change.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Required application security controls
NIST 800-53SC-8
Transmission confidentiality and integrity
How to fix this
1
Add header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
2
Verify all subdomains support HTTPS before adding includeSubDomains
3
Test with: curl -sI https://mojo-app.com | grep -i strict
4
Submit to hstspreload.org after confirming the header is correct
3
Add missing security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
Impact: 1–2 Hours
HIGH
5 of 5 recommended security headers are missing on mojo-app.com: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These headers protect against clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and unauthorized browser feature access. Adding them is a server configuration change with no application code changes required.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Security headers are required application controls
OWASPSecure Headers
Recommended baseline for web applications
How to fix this
1
Add Content-Security-Policy header (start with report-only to avoid breakage)
2
Add: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
3
Add: X-Frame-Options: DENY (or SAMEORIGIN if you use iframes)
4
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
5
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
6
Verify with: curl -sI https://mojo-app.com | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
4
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for mojo-app.com can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .com TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec mojo-app.com
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
Not configured
Strengths: SPF record present with soft-fail (~all). Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com ~all
Security Headers
0/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Not enabled
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 39 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns4.dnsimple-edge.org., ns1.dnsimple.com., ns2.dnsimple-edge.net., ns3.dnsimple.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.