Security checks — sorted by severity
HSTS Header
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
Security Headers
None of the 5 recommended security headers are present (missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy). This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
None of the 5 recommended security headers are present (missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy). This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
MX Records & Mail Provider
Strengths: Mail handled by mail.nokyccasino.ltd; 1 MX record(s) configured. Issues: Only 1 MX record — no failover if primary mail server is unavailable.
Strengths: Mail handled by mail.nokyccasino.ltd; 1 MX record(s) configured. Issues: Only 1 MX record — no failover if primary mail server is unavailable.
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
DNS CAA Records
No CAA records found. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorized CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.
No CAA records found. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorized CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 3 nameservers configured (ns2.wpx.net., ns1.wpx.net., ns3.wpx.net.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Strengths: 3 nameservers configured (ns2.wpx.net., ns1.wpx.net., ns3.wpx.net.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DKIM configured (selectors: dkim). Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; SPF record uses neutral (?all) — no real enforcement.
Strengths: DKIM configured (selectors: dkim). Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; SPF record uses neutral (?all) — no real enforcement.
security.txt (RFC 9116)
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 63 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt; 53 certificates logged in CT. Issues: Certificates issued by 4 different CAs (threshold: 3 for 53 logged certs) — possible misconfiguration or shadow IT.
Strengths: Certificate valid, 63 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt; 53 certificates logged in CT. Issues: Certificates issued by 4 different CAs (threshold: 3 for 53 logged certs) — possible misconfiguration or shadow IT.
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Cookie Security
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: WPX, PHP/8.4.19. No high or critical CVEs found for detected versions.
Detected technologies: WPX, PHP/8.4.19. No high or critical CVEs found for detected versions.
Recommended actions
1+ items
Steps to improve nokyccasino.ltd's security grade, ranked by impact.
1
Strengthen email authentication configuration
Email authentication is partially configured for nokyccasino.ltd but has gaps. Actions needed: upgrade DMARC policy from 'none' to 'quarantine' or 'reject'. Until DMARC enforcement is active, spoofed emails may still reach recipients.
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
How to fix this
1
Upgrade DMARC policy to p=quarantine (then p=reject after monitoring)
2
Verify with: nslookup -type=txt _dmarc.nokyccasino.ltd
See all 4 remaining recommendations
Enter your work email to unlock the full action plan.
No spam. We only send security-related updates.
Report unlocked.
AI Summary
What this means
nokyccasino.ltd scored 65/100, meeting baseline requirements but with 7 findings that require attention. The vendor can proceed with a remediation timeline agreement.
Critical gaps in: HSTS Header, Security Headers. Positive signals: TLS Configuration, TLS Protocol Support, Known Breaches all passed.
5 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.
How nokyccasino.ltd compares
Grade distribution across 2678 companies we've scanned. nokyccasino.ltd scores better than 33% of them.
88
A+
28
A
194
A-
200
B+
75
B
376
B-
137
C+
117
C
347
C-
123
D+
96
D
265
D-
632
F
nokyccasino.ltd — Grade D (65/100)
2678 companies scanned
At a glance
Key data points from the scan.
TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
Not configured
Strengths: DKIM configured (selectors: dkim). Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; SPF record uses neutral (?all) — no real enforcement.
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 a mx a:nokyccasino.ltd ip4:5.254.55.40 ip4:5.254.58.18 ?all
Security Headers
0/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Not enabled
Strict-Transport-Security header is missing. Connections can be downgraded to HTTP via man-in-the-middle attacks.
SSL Certificate
Issues
Strengths: Certificate valid, 63 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt; 53 certificates logged in CT. Issues: Certificates issued by 4 different CAs (threshold: 3 for 53 logged certs) — possible misconfiguration or shadow IT.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 3 nameservers configured (ns2.wpx.net., ns1.wpx.net., ns3.wpx.net.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Similar companies
Other domains with comparable security profiles.
