Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
A
95 / 100

serverhunter.com

Security report · Scanned April 06, 2026

Checks
14
Passed
10
Warnings
4
Critical
0
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

serverhunter.com scored 95/100, demonstrating a strong security posture. Minor improvements are noted below.

Positive signals: MX Records & Mail Provider, TLS Configuration, DNS Configuration all passed.

1 action item identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How serverhunter.com compares

Grade distribution across 2445 companies we've scanned. serverhunter.com scores better than 96% of them.

96th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
75
A+
24
A
180
A-
187
B+
71
B
342
B-
118
C+
112
C
308
C-
114
D+
93
D
226
D-
595
F
serverhunter.com — Grade A (95/100) 2445 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of serverhunter.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Needs work
DNS CAA Records
Strengths: CAA records configured (10 record(s)); Authorized CAs: letsencrypt.org, pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes, ssl.com, comodoca.com, digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes. Issues: No iodef record — CA violations won't be reported to the domain owner.
Needs work
Security Headers
3/5 security headers present. Missing: Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy.
Needs work
security.txt (RFC 9116)
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
Needs work
MX Records & Mail Provider
Strengths: Mail handled by linda.mx.cloudflare.net; 3 MX record(s) configured; Multiple MX records provide redundancy.
Healthy
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Healthy
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (anna.ns.cloudflare.com., terry.ns.cloudflare.com.); 3 MX records present; DNSSEC enabled; Zone transfers properly restricted.
Healthy
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Healthy
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
Healthy
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
Cookie Security
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
Healthy
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DMARC policy set to reject (strongest); SPF record present with hard-fail (-all); DKIM configured (selectors: google).
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: cloudflare. (cloudflare detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). All detected technologies are upstream CDN/proxy infrastructure. No application-level software versions exposed.
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 87 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services; 649 certificates logged in CT; Certificates from 6 CAs: "CloudFlare, "Cloudflare, COMODO CA Limited. Note: Wildcard certificate in use (*.domain) — covers all subdomains. Common practice; worth noting that compromise would affect all subdomains.
Healthy
Recommended actions
1 item

Steps to improve serverhunter.com's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Add optional security headers (Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
Impact: < 1 Hour
LOW
serverhunter.com has most security headers configured. Missing: Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These are best-practice additions that reduce the attack surface for client-side vulnerabilities.
How to fix this
1
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
2
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
3
Verify with: curl -sI https://serverhunter.com | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
p=reject
Strengths: DMARC policy set to reject (strongest); SPF record present with hard-fail (-all); DKIM configured (selectors: google).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net -all
Security Headers
3/5 present
Missing: Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000s (365 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 87 days remaining; Issued by Google Trust Services; 649 certificates logged in CT; Certificates from 6 CAs: "CloudFlare, "Cloudflare, COMODO CA Limited. Note: Wildcard certificate in use (*.domain) — covers all subdomains. Common practice; worth noting that compromise would affect all subdomains.
DNSSEC
Enabled
Strengths: 2 nameservers configured (anna.ns.cloudflare.com., terry.ns.cloudflare.com.); 3 MX records present; DNSSEC enabled; Zone transfers properly restricted.