Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
AI-Generated Summary
What this means
tequitable.com scored 82/100, demonstrating a strong security posture. Minor improvements are noted below.
Critical gaps in: Security Headers. Positive signals: Known Breaches, TLS Configuration, DMARC / Email Security all passed.
3 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.
How tequitable.com compares
Grade distribution across 2378 companies we've scanned. tequitable.com scores better than 72% of them.
71
A+
22
A
180
A-
181
B+
69
B
333
B-
111
C+
111
C
295
C-
110
D+
92
D
216
D-
587
F
tequitable.com — Grade B- (82/100)
2378 companies scanned
Security checks
Each check inspects a different part of tequitable.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.
Security Headers
Only 1/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.com., ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.com., ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.com., ns-cloud-e2.googledomains.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
HSTS Header
HSTS present but max-age is low (0s). Recommended minimum: 15768000 (6 months).
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: Squarespace. No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: google, s1, s2).
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 74 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt.
Recommended actions
3 items
Steps to improve tequitable.com's security grade, ranked by impact.
1
Add missing security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
4 of 5 recommended security headers are missing on tequitable.com: CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These headers protect against clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and unauthorized browser feature access. Adding them is a server configuration change with no application code changes required.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Security headers are required application controls
OWASPSecure Headers
Recommended baseline for web applications
How to fix this
1
Add Content-Security-Policy header (start with report-only to avoid breakage)
2
Add: X-Frame-Options: DENY (or SAMEORIGIN if you use iframes)
3
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
4
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
5
Verify with: curl -sI https://tequitable.com | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
See all recommendations
Enter your work email to unlock the full action plan.
No spam. We only send security-related updates.
Report unlocked.
2
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for tequitable.com can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .com TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec tequitable.com
3
Increase HSTS max-age duration
HSTS is enabled but the max-age (0s) is below the recommended minimum of 15768000s (6 months). A short max-age means browsers forget the HTTPS-only policy quickly, reducing protection between visits.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Application security header configuration
How to fix this
1
Update header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
2
Verify: curl -sI https://tequitable.com | grep -i strict
At a glance
Key data points from the scan.
TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
p=quarantine
Strengths: DMARC policy set to quarantine; SPF record present with soft-fail (~all); DKIM configured (selectors: google, s1, s2).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:8092885.spf06.hubspotemail.net ~all
Security Headers
1/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Not enabled
HSTS present but max-age is low (0s). Recommended minimum: 15768000 (6 months).
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 74 days remaining; Issued by Let's Encrypt.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.com., ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.com., ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.com., ns-cloud-e2.googledomains.com.); 5 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.