Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
C+
78 / 100

textpayme.com

Security report · Scanned February 18, 2026

Checks
8
Passed
5
Warnings
2
Critical
1
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

textpayme.com scored 78/100, meeting baseline requirements but with 2 findings that require attention. The vendor can proceed with a remediation timeline agreement.

Critical gaps in: Security Headers. Positive signals: Known Breaches, DMARC / Email Security, CVE Exposure all passed.

3 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How textpayme.com compares

Grade distribution across 2378 companies we've scanned. textpayme.com scores better than 59% of them.

59th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
71
A+
22
A
180
A-
181
B+
69
B
333
B-
111
C+
111
C
295
C-
110
D+
92
D
216
D-
587
F
textpayme.com — Grade C+ (78/100) 2378 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of textpayme.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

Security Headers
Only 0/5 security headers present. Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. This exposes the application to clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and other client-side attacks.
Problem
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 6 nameservers configured (pdns4.ultradns.org., pdns5.ultradns.info., pdns6.ultradns.co.uk., pdns1.ultradns.net.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
Needs work
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: DMARC policy set to reject (strongest); SPF record present with hard-fail (-all). Issues: No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
Healthy
CVE Exposure
Detected technologies: Server, Proxy/CDN. (Proxy/CDN detected but excluded from CVE matching — upstream infrastructure). No version information exposed — CVE matching not possible (this is good practice).
Healthy
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=47474747 with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 63 days remaining; Issued by Amazon.
Healthy
Recommended actions
3 items

Steps to improve textpayme.com's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Add missing security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
Impact: 1–2 Hours
HIGH
5 of 5 recommended security headers are missing on textpayme.com: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. These headers protect against clickjacking, MIME-sniffing, and unauthorized browser feature access. Adding them is a server configuration change with no application code changes required.
Compliance impact
PCI-DSS 4.0Req 6.4.1
Security headers are required application controls
OWASPSecure Headers
Recommended baseline for web applications
How to fix this
1
Add Content-Security-Policy header (start with report-only to avoid breakage)
2
Add: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
3
Add: X-Frame-Options: DENY (or SAMEORIGIN if you use iframes)
4
Add: Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
5
Add: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
6
Verify with: curl -sI https://textpayme.com | grep -iE 'content-security|x-frame|x-content|referrer|permissions'
2
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for textpayme.com can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .com TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec textpayme.com
3
Upgrade to TLS 1.3
Impact: < 1 Hour
LOW
textpayme.com negotiated TLSv1.2. TLS 1.2 is still compliant under all major security frameworks and is not a vulnerability. TLS 1.3 offers faster handshakes and removes legacy cipher negotiation. This is a best-practice improvement, not a compliance gap.
How to fix this
1
Update web server config to prefer TLS 1.3 (nginx: ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3)
2
Verify: openssl s_client -connect textpayme.com:443 -tls1_3
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.2
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
DMARC Policy
p=reject
Strengths: DMARC policy set to reject (strongest); SPF record present with hard-fail (-all). Issues: No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1-all
Security Headers
0/5 present
Missing: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=47474747 with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 63 days remaining; Issued by Amazon.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 6 nameservers configured (pdns4.ultradns.org., pdns5.ultradns.info., pdns6.ultradns.co.uk., pdns1.ultradns.net.); 1 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.