Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
C
75 / 100

thisisl.com

Security report · Scanned February 18, 2026

Checks
8
Passed
4
Warnings
4
Critical
0
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

thisisl.com scored 75/100, meeting baseline requirements but with 4 findings that require attention. The vendor can proceed with a remediation timeline agreement.

Positive signals: Known Breaches, HSTS Header, Security Headers all passed.

4 action items identified, including 0 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How thisisl.com compares

Grade distribution across 2378 companies we've scanned. thisisl.com scores better than 55% of them.

55th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
71
A+
22
A
180
A-
181
B+
69
B
333
B-
111
C+
111
C
295
C-
110
D+
92
D
216
D-
587
F
thisisl.com — Grade C (75/100) 2378 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of thisisl.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

DNS Configuration
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns2-03.azure-dns.net., ns3-03.azure-dns.org., ns4-03.azure-dns.info., ns1-03.azure-dns.com.); 7 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
Needs work
DMARC / Email Security
Strengths: SPF record present; DKIM configured (selectors: s1, s2, mandrill). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement).
Needs work
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 193 days remaining; Issued by Sectigo Limited. Issues: Wildcard certificate in use — broader attack surface if compromised.
Needs work
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000 with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
Healthy
Security Headers
All 5 recommended security headers present: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
No server software versions detected in HTTP response headers. This is good practice (version hiding) but means CVE exposure cannot be assessed from external signals alone.
Healthy
Recommended actions
4 items

Steps to improve thisisl.com's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Strengthen email authentication configuration
Impact: 2–4 Hours
HIGH
Email authentication is partially configured for thisisl.com but has gaps. Actions needed: upgrade DMARC policy from 'none' to 'quarantine' or 'reject'. Until DMARC enforcement is active, spoofed emails may still reach recipients.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
How to fix this
1
Upgrade DMARC policy to p=quarantine (then p=reject after monitoring)
2
Verify with: nslookup -type=txt _dmarc.thisisl.com
2
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for thisisl.com can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .com TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec thisisl.com
3
Upgrade to TLS 1.3
Impact: < 1 Hour
LOW
thisisl.com negotiated TLSv1.2. TLS 1.2 is still compliant under all major security frameworks and is not a vulnerability. TLS 1.3 offers faster handshakes and removes legacy cipher negotiation. This is a best-practice improvement, not a compliance gap.
How to fix this
1
Update web server config to prefer TLS 1.3 (nginx: ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3)
2
Verify: openssl s_client -connect thisisl.com:443 -tls1_3
4
Review certificate configuration
Impact: 1–2 Hours
LOW
Certificate issues found for thisisl.com: wildcard certificate in use. Wildcard certificates have a broader blast radius if compromised. These are operational hygiene items, not immediate security risks.
How to fix this
1
Consider replacing wildcard cert with individual certs for critical subdomains
2
Consolidate certificate issuance to 1–2 trusted CAs
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.2
TLSv1.2 negotiated. Issues: TLS 1.2 negotiated (1.3 preferred).
DMARC Policy
p=none
Strengths: SPF record present; DKIM configured (selectors: s1, s2, mandrill). Issues: DMARC policy is 'none' (monitoring only, no enforcement).
SPF Record
Present
v=spf1 include:spf.mandrillapp.com
Security Headers
5/5 present
All headers configured.
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=31536000 with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
SSL Certificate
Issues
Strengths: Certificate valid, 193 days remaining; Issued by Sectigo Limited. Issues: Wildcard certificate in use — broader attack surface if compromised.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 4 nameservers configured (ns2-03.azure-dns.net., ns3-03.azure-dns.org., ns4-03.azure-dns.info., ns1-03.azure-dns.com.); 7 MX records present; Zone transfers properly restricted. Issues: DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.