Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
C+
78 / 100

www.fortisinc.com

Security report · Scanned May 12, 2026

Checks
14
Passed
8
Warnings
5
Critical
1
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

www.fortisinc.com scored 78/100, meeting baseline requirements but with 5 findings that require attention. The vendor can proceed with a remediation timeline agreement.

Critical gaps in: DMARC / Email Security. Positive signals: MX Records & Mail Provider, TLS Configuration, TLS Protocol Support all passed.

3 action items identified, including 1 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How www.fortisinc.com compares

Grade distribution across 2655 companies we've scanned. www.fortisinc.com scores better than 59% of them.

59th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
88
A+
27
A
191
A-
198
B+
75
B
371
B-
137
C+
117
C
342
C-
122
D+
95
D
261
D-
631
F
www.fortisinc.com — Grade C+ (78/100) 2655 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of www.fortisinc.com's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

DMARC / Email Security
Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
Problem
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Needs work
DNS CAA Records
Strengths: CAA records configured (1 record(s)); Authorized CAs: digicert.com. Issues: No iodef record — CA violations won't be reported to the domain owner.
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Strengths: DNSSEC enabled. Issues: No NS records found (unusual).
Needs work
Security Headers
3/5 security headers present. Missing: X-Frame-Options, Permissions-Policy.
Needs work
security.txt (RFC 9116)
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
Needs work
MX Records & Mail Provider
No MX records found. This domain does not receive email directly — this is intentional for many domains and carries no security risk. If email is expected, verify mail routing via A/AAAA fallback or a mail provider.
Healthy
TLS Configuration
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
Healthy
TLS Protocol Support
Strengths: TLS 1.3 supported; TLS 1.2 supported; TLS 1.3 supported (strongest). Protocol support: TLS 1.3: Yes, TLS 1.2: Yes, TLS 1.1: No, TLS 1.0: No.
Healthy
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
Cookie Security
No cookies set on the homepage response. No cookie security flags to evaluate.
Healthy
HSTS Header
HSTS enabled: max-age=63072000s (730 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
No server software versions detected in HTTP response headers. This is good practice (version hiding) but means CVE exposure cannot be assessed from external signals alone.
Healthy
Certificate Hygiene
Strengths: Certificate valid, 99 days remaining; Issued by DigiCert Inc.
Healthy
Recommended actions
1 item

Steps to improve www.fortisinc.com's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Set up email authentication (DMARC, SPF, DKIM)
Impact: 1–2 Days
CRITICAL
Without email authentication, anyone can send emails that appear to come from www.fortisinc.com. This is the most common vector for phishing attacks targeting employees and customers. DMARC, SPF, DKIM are not configured.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
ISO 27001A.13.2.1
Information transfer policies require email security controls
HIPAA§164.312(e)
Transmission security for electronic PHI
How to fix this
1
Add SPF record to DNS: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all (adjust for your email provider)
2
Configure DKIM signing with your email provider and publish the public key in DNS
3
Add DMARC record: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:[email protected]
4
Monitor DMARC reports for 2–4 weeks, then upgrade policy to p=reject
2
 
 
●●●
3
 
 
●●●
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
TLSv1.3
TLSv1.3 negotiated with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit). Strong configuration with no deprecated protocols or weak ciphers detected.
DMARC Policy
Not configured
Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
SPF Record
Missing
No SPF record found.
Security Headers
3/5 present
Missing: X-Frame-Options, Permissions-Policy
HSTS
Enabled
HSTS enabled: max-age=63072000s (730 days) with includeSubDomains and preload. Meets best-practice configuration.
SSL Certificate
Valid
Strengths: Certificate valid, 99 days remaining; Issued by DigiCert Inc.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: DNSSEC enabled. Issues: No NS records found (unusual).