Overview
Findings
Actions
Details
Related
F
38 / 100

rx.linkfanel.net

Security report · Scanned April 06, 2026

Checks
14
Passed
2
Warnings
6
Critical
1
AI-Generated Summary
What this means

rx.linkfanel.net scored 38/100 and does not meet the minimum security posture threshold. The most critical issue is: Set up email authentication (DMARC, SPF, DKIM). This must be addressed before the vendor can be approved for procurement or data processing activities.

Critical gaps in: DMARC / Email Security. Positive signals: Known Breaches, CVE Exposure all passed.

3 action items identified, including 1 critical. The issues are configuration gaps, not architectural problems. A focused remediation effort of 2–5 days could address all findings.

How rx.linkfanel.net compares

Grade distribution across 2445 companies we've scanned. rx.linkfanel.net scores better than 0% of them.

0th percentile
0 Percentile rank 100
75
A+
24
A
180
A-
187
B+
71
B
342
B-
118
C+
112
C
308
C-
114
D+
93
D
226
D-
595
F
rx.linkfanel.net — Grade F (38/100) 2445 companies scanned
Security checks

Each check inspects a different part of rx.linkfanel.net's public security setup. Green means healthy, yellow needs attention, red is a problem.

DMARC / Email Security
Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
Problem
MX Records & Mail Provider
Strengths: Mail handled by andrea.linkfanel.net; 1 MX record(s) configured. Issues: Only 1 MX record — no failover if primary mail server is unavailable.
Needs work
MTA-STS & TLS Reporting
Issues: No MTA-STS configured — email in transit is vulnerable to TLS downgrade attacks. Sending servers cannot verify that your mail server requires TLS; No TLSRPT record — TLS delivery failures won't be reported to domain owner.
Needs work
DNS CAA Records
No CAA records found. Without CAA, any Certificate Authority can issue certificates for this domain. Adding CAA records restricts issuance to authorized CAs only, reducing the risk of misissued certificates.
Needs work
DNS Configuration
Strengths: 1 MX records present. Issues: No NS records found (unusual); DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.
Needs work
security.txt (RFC 9116)
No security.txt found. Publishing a security.txt at /.well-known/security.txt is the industry standard (RFC 9116) for vulnerability disclosure policies. Its absence may indicate a less mature security program.
Needs work
Certificate Hygiene
Issues: Could not retrieve certificate details.
Needs work
TLS Configuration
Could not complete TLS handshake with rx.linkfanel.net:443 — [Errno 101] Network is unreachable
Skipped
TLS Protocol Support
Could not connect to rx.linkfanel.net:443 on any TLS version.
Skipped
HSTS Header
Could not fetch https://rx.linkfanel.net — connection failed or timed out.
Skipped
Security Headers
Could not fetch https://rx.linkfanel.net — connection failed or timed out.
Skipped
Cookie Security
Could not fetch rx.linkfanel.net to analyze cookies: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='rx.linkfanel.net', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("HTTPSConnection(host='rx.linkfanel.net', port=443): Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 101] Network is unreachable"))
Skipped
Known Breaches
No known breaches found in public disclosure databases.
Healthy
CVE Exposure
No server software versions detected in HTTP response headers. This is good practice (version hiding) but means CVE exposure cannot be assessed from external signals alone.
Healthy
Recommended actions
3 items

Steps to improve rx.linkfanel.net's security grade, ranked by impact.

1
Set up email authentication (DMARC, SPF, DKIM)
Impact: 1–2 Days
CRITICAL
Without email authentication, anyone can send emails that appear to come from rx.linkfanel.net. This is the most common vector for phishing attacks targeting employees and customers. DMARC, SPF, DKIM are not configured.
Compliance impact
NIST CSFPR.AC-7
Email authentication is a required access control
ISO 27001A.13.2.1
Information transfer policies require email security controls
HIPAA§164.312(e)
Transmission security for electronic PHI
How to fix this
1
Add SPF record to DNS: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all (adjust for your email provider)
2
Configure DKIM signing with your email provider and publish the public key in DNS
3
Add DMARC record: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:[email protected]
4
Monitor DMARC reports for 2–4 weeks, then upgrade policy to p=reject
2
Enable DNSSEC on your domain
Impact: 1–3 Days (Depends On Registrar)
MEDIUM
Without DNSSEC, DNS responses for rx.linkfanel.net can be spoofed, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. This requires coordination with your domain registrar to publish DS records.
Compliance impact
NIST 800-53SC-20
Secure name/address resolution service
How to fix this
1
Check if your DNS provider supports DNSSEC (Cloudflare, Route53, etc.)
2
Enable DNSSEC signing in your DNS provider dashboard
3
Add the DS record to your registrar for .net TLD
4
Verify: dig +dnssec rx.linkfanel.net
3
Review certificate configuration
Impact: 1–2 Hours
LOW
Certificate issues found for rx.linkfanel.net: . These are operational hygiene items, not immediate security risks.
How to fix this
1
Consolidate certificate issuance to 1–2 trusted CAs
At a glance

Key data points from the scan.

TLS Version
Issues detected
Could not complete TLS handshake with rx.linkfanel.net:443 — [Errno 101] Network is unreachable
DMARC Policy
Not configured
Issues: No DMARC record found — email spoofing is not prevented; No SPF record found; No DKIM records found for common selectors (domain may use custom selectors — this is not a confirmed gap).
SPF Record
Missing
No SPF record found.
Security Headers
0/0 present
All headers configured.
HSTS
Not enabled
Could not fetch https://rx.linkfanel.net — connection failed or timed out.
SSL Certificate
Issues
Issues: Could not retrieve certificate details.
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Strengths: 1 MX records present. Issues: No NS records found (unusual); DNSSEC not configured — DNS responses can be spoofed.